Decision Sciences
7 years ago

Systematic reviews on peri-implant diseases often disagree on risk of bias, highlighting need for standardized assessment.

Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri‐implant diseases with two methodological tools
Clóvis Mariano Faggion, Alberto Monje, Jason Wasiak

Paper Summary

The article compares two tools used to evaluate reviews on treating peri-implant diseases. They found that most reviews had a high risk of bias, and some had low methodological quality. The ROBIS tool was more critical than the AMSTAR checklist. Different reviews disagreed on the risk of bias for the same studies.

Related papers

Decision Sciences
2 years ago

New tool revolutionizes confidence assessment in healthcare systematic reviews!

Evidence Synthesis
1 view
Decision Sciences
2 years ago

Unveiling the Secrets of Systematic Reviews: A Game-Changer for Healthcare

Evidence Synthesis
Practice Implementation
Delphi Method
1 view
Decision Sciences
4 years ago

New tool revolutionizes assessing prevalence data in systematic reviews!

Evidence Synthesis
1 view