The paper discusses a type of argument that challenges the idea that truth and falsity can be applied to the conditions of knowledge. This argument is different from other approaches that either try to answer skeptics or accept their challenge and retreat. Instead, it denies the assumption behind the challenge. This approach, influenced by Collingwood and Kant, takes a pragmatic direction that doesn't fully align with traditional views but still upholds the importance of philosophy in understanding our entitlement to knowledge.