Transcendental arguments aim to show the necessary conditions for things like thinking and seeing. Some argue against doubt, but face problems with hidden beliefs. This thesis challenges those beliefs by looking at ideas from Merleau-Ponty and Wittgenstein. Instead of needing strong conditions to beat doubt, these thinkers offer a different way to think about transcendental claims. By changing how we see necessity, universality, and a priori knowledge, a new, non-metaphysical approach is suggested. This helps bring back the critical thinking Kant wanted in transcendental ideas.