The article discusses the sustainability of academic software used for static analysis. Researchers looked at 60 papers from ASE and SCAM conferences to see how sustainable these software tools are. They found that many of these tools are not easily accessible to the public, have short lifespans, and are not widely recognized by other researchers. This lack of visibility and recognition can make it challenging for others to use or contribute to these tools effectively. The study suggests that improving the publicization and recognition of academic software could benefit the scientific community as a whole.