The U.S. Supreme Court is considering a case involving Ford Motor Company and personal jurisdiction. Ford argues that a strict causal link between a company's contacts in a state and a plaintiff's claims should be required for jurisdiction. However, the Court's past decisions show that this is not necessary. Requiring causation could lead to inefficiencies and prevent states from regulating injuries and products within their borders. The Court should not adopt Ford's proposal because it goes against precedent and could complicate and disrupt litigation processes.