The article discusses how economists and philosophers have a narrow view of tort law, focusing only on its rules and not its procedures. Economists overlook the full costs and benefits of tort law, affecting their claims about its impact. Philosophers also neglect the procedural side of tort, leading to misunderstandings about justice and tort law. A thought experiment with Harry Potter is used to highlight these overlooked aspects of tort law. The article suggests that both economists and philosophers need to consider the full picture of tort law to make accurate claims and improve their theories.