New grant evaluation model improves efficiency and transparency in infrastructure investments
The article discusses how the European Commission, regional governments, and private firms make decisions about grants for projects. The EC offers money, the regional government adds more, and the firm claims to need it. If the firm is found to be efficient, there's a penalty. The regional government can share extra info but needs a reward to not help the firm. This extra info helps reduce grant value and improve decision-making. The paper suggests including post-project evaluations in planning contracts and rewarding regional governments for sharing info before projects start.