In today's world, where "alternative facts" are common, the article discusses the potential impact on our constitutional law system. It explores how powerful interests can manipulate facts to shape court decisions. To address this issue, the author suggests empowering courts to fact-check more actively in constitutional cases. By scrutinizing claims and encouraging thorough fact-checking, courts can help prevent false information from influencing legal outcomes. The goal is to ensure that decisions are based on accurate information rather than misleading narratives in a "post-truth" society.